Legal Opinion · Dissent

Panzieri-Hogan Co. v. Bender

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1923Published

1Dissent

Kiley, J. (dissenting):

This case was before this court on a former appeal (202 App. Div. 94). The facts and principles involved are very fully stated in the opinion; only brief references and recitals will be attempted here. The plaintiff, a contracting corporation, entered into a written agreement with the defendant to reconstruct, rebuild and change, according to plans and specifications furnished with said contract, a building in the city of Albany, N. Y. Said contract provided for a time limit on the work, and clause 8 thereof provided as follows: “ In case the party of the first part…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGovern v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Crocker-Wheeler Co. v. Varick Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Panzieri-Hogan Co. v. BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API