Legal Opinion
United States v. Cortinas
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 28, 1992No. CR-91-1412PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
The defendant in this criminal action seeks to dismiss both counts of the indictment against him on the ground that the indictment was filed in violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 et seq. For the reasons indicated below, count one of the indictment is dismissed without prejudice; count two of the indictment is not dismissed.
FACTS
The defendant, Romeo Cortinas, was arrested on September 5, 1991 pursuant to a warrant issued by Magistrate Judge Carter. That warrant was predicated on a complaint that charged Cortinas with conspiring to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. James Tunnessen, Douglas Fullerton, and Michael Robert Reape, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Joseph John RussoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Charles SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Peter NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. MancusoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. ArcherDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- United States v. PeppinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- United States v. SolninDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- United States v. DeasDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.