Legal Opinion

Bank of Stockton v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2010No. 09-15909Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

The Bank of Stockton appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Verizon Communications, Inc. in this suit for damages from the alleged wrongful escheatment of the Bank’s Verizon stock under California’s Unclaimed Property Law, Cal.Civ.Proc. Code §§ 1300, et seq. We affirm. 1 The Bank received the proceeds of the State Controller’s sale of its Verizon shares pursuant to California Civil Procedure Code section 1540 and failed to show damages beyond the amount tendered to it.

The Bank’s proposed calculation of damages at the “highest market value” of the stock…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Potts v. PaxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wong v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API