Legal Opinion

Mutty v. Department of Corrections

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 12, 2017No. Docket: Ken-16-35PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] This appeal concerns whether a petition to review a disciplinary decision by the Department of Corrections was timely filed and whether the court properly dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

[¶ 2] Daniel E. Mutty appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Marden, J.) dismissing his Rule 80C petition for failure to state a claim and an order (Murphy, J.) denying his motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to M.R. Civ. P 60(b). We conclude that the court erred in dismissing the petition and vacate the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND1

[If 3] On July 21, 2015,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Windham Land Trust v. JeffordsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  2. Davric Maine Corp. v. Bangor Historic Track, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Tomer v. Maine Human Rights CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Pederson v. ColeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. Sewall v. Spinney Creek Oyster Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anctil v. Dep't of Corr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  2. Daniel E. Mutty v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Sweeney v. Dep't of Corr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API