Legal Opinion

Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1967No. Appeal, 222PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones,

Pasquale Fiumara, [Fiumara], the owner of a gasoline station, on August 5, 1964, filed a petition in the Court of Common Pleas No. 5 of Philadelphia County for a rule to show cause why a complaint he proposed to file against Texaco, Inc., Sinclair Refining Company, Humble Oil and Refining Company, Gulf Oil Corporation and Richfield Oil Corporation of New York, [Oil Companies], “shall not remain within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court [of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County].” The complaint, not filed but attached to Fiumara’s petition, 1 charged the Oil…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. White Cross Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Howard Farmer v. Arabian American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paul v. PaulSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API