Autologic Inc. v. Cristinzio Movers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s petition to open a default judgment. Appellant contends that the court below erred in denying the petition on the basis that appellant had not reasonably explained its default. We disagree with appellant and, accordingly, affirm the order of the trial court.
In August of 1980, appellee had equipment moved from California to Pennsylvania. It engaged appellant to move the equipment from Folcroft, Pennsylvania to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. In October of 1980, appellant was informed by appellee’s attorneys that appellee was claiming…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Provident Credit Corp. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Campbell v. Heilman Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bethlehem Apparatus Co. v. H. N. Crowder, Jr., Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Baskerville v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by21 opinions
- Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Flynn v. Casa Di Bertacchi Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Flynn v. America West AirlinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Wolfskill v. EganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Burkett v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.