Legal Opinion

Autologic Inc. v. Cristinzio Movers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 1984No. 03509PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s petition to open a default judgment. Appellant contends that the court below erred in denying the petition on the basis that appellant had not reasonably explained its default. We disagree with appellant and, accordingly, affirm the order of the trial court.

In August of 1980, appellee had equipment moved from California to Pennsylvania. It engaged appellant to move the equipment from Folcroft, Pennsylvania to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. In October of 1980, appellant was informed by appellee’s attorneys that appellee was claiming…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Provident Credit Corp. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Campbell v. Heilman Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Bethlehem Apparatus Co. v. H. N. Crowder, Jr., Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Baskerville v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Flynn v. Casa Di Bertacchi Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Flynn v. America West AirlinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Wolfskill v. EganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Burkett v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API