Legal Opinion
Leo v. Local Union No. 612 of International Union of Operating Engineers
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1946No. 29792PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
The plaintiffs, Howard A. Leo, Fred E. Brown, and J. B. Burns, originally instituted these actions separately against Local Union No. 612 of International Union of Operating Engineers, James Estep, as president thereof, and Earl Palmatier, as business agent and financial secretary thereof, to secure their reinstatement as members of defendant union, and for damages sustained by them as a result of their alleged expulsion from the union, which expulsion had been preceded by the loss of their employment upon demand of the union. Upon stipulation of the parties, the actions were consolidated for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mulroy v. Supreme Lodge of the Knights of HonorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Smetherham v. Laundry Workers' Union, Local No. 75California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Rueb v. RehderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Local Union No. 57, Brotherhood of Painters v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Ray v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenWashington Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Washington Local Lodge No. 104 of International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders & Helpers v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders & HelpersWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Barnhart v. United Automobile, Etc., Local 669New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Mahoney v. Sailors' Union of PacificWashington Supreme Court · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.