Legal Opinion
Local Union No. 57, Brotherhood of Painters v. Boyd
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 3, 1944No. 6 Div. 190PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
Upon consideration of demurrer to the bill, it is of course understood that averments of fact are considered as admitted to be true. These facts are alleged in the bill with much particularity, and with the exhibit thereto, constituted a rather lengthy pleading. This was justified upon the theory that complainant was seeking a preliminary mandatory injunction, where the rule requires that the case be a very strong and urgent one to induce the court to issue the writ. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Kelley, 77 N.J.Eq. 129, 75 A. 758, 140 Am.St.Rep. 541; Powhatan Coal & Coke Co.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Board of Education of Marshall County v. BaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. RitzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Matter of Brown v. . Order of ForestersNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- St. John Dixon v. Alabama State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Al Friedman v. International Association of MacHinistsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Gulf South Conference v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.