Russell v. Carleson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment which denied them a writ of mandate and injunctive relief in their class action challenging the constitutionality of Welfare and Institutions Code section 11351.5, as implemented and enforced by defendants. The judgment declared the statute, and certain administrative regulations adopted under it, to be constitutional.
The cause was submitted for decision on the pleadings, declarations under penalty of perjury, documentary exhibits, and admissions made in response to written request. Although findings were neither made nor requested, the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Credit Insurance General Agents Ass'n v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- O. G. Sansone Co. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.