Farnsworth v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was tried before a jury and convicted in the Municipal Criminal Court of the city of Tulsa, of the charge of driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and the penalty was fixed by the jury at confinement in jail for ten days.
The record developed that the defendant was a responsible business man of Tulsa, *746age 68; that lie drove ahead of the prosecuting witness to a street intersection in Tulsa, and stopped at a stop sign, but apparently decided that his vehicle protruded out too…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Keith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Ryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Lyons v. WorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hoskins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Appeal of the Revocation of the Driver's License of DunganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Puckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
- Handley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.