Legal Opinion
Daniels v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 27, 1967No. A-13951PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIX, Presiding Judge:
Plaintiff in error, James Harold Daniels, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was charged in the District Court of Oklahoma County with the crime of Grand Larceny. He was tried by a jury, found guilty, and his punishment assessed at One Year in the penitentiary. From that judgment and sentence he has appealed to this Court.
Defendant’s first allegation of error is that the trial court erred in summarily overruling his motion to suppress and allowing tainted evidence to be admitted at the trial. First of all, this Court will take notice of the statement in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoskins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
- Davie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
- Phinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- Farnsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- Erickson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
- Van Horn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.