Legal Opinion

State v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 23, 2017No. CR1412315; A158936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

Defendant was convicted after a bench trial of harassment, ORS 166.065, and interference with making a report, ORS 165.572. He appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained after police entered his home without a warrant. We conclude that the warrantless entry into defendant’s home was not justified by the emergency aid exception to the warrant requirement. We also reject the state’s alternative argument that defendant consented to the entry. Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress, and reverse and remand the judgment.

In…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. FreundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Nelson v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Servs. (In re Nelson)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API