Lucky v. Sears Roebuck and Co., Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHRUM, Judge.
Pamela Lucky (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). Commission’s order adopts and affirms a decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security (Division) that Claimant was disqualified for unemployment benefits. We affirm.
Claimant filed an application with Division for unemployment benefits. Her application recited that she had quit her job with Sears Roebuck and Company, Inc. (Sears). Sears protested her claim, saying that she “voluntarily quit” because she was “dissatisfied with job and duties.” A…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prueliage v. De Seaton CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Barkley v. Carter County State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Delaney v. GibsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Martin v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- May Department Stores Co. v. County of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lewis v. Fort Zumwalt School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Treaster v. BettsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State ex rel. East Carter County R-II School District v. HellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Edwards v. MID-AM METAL FORMING, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- JULIA ANN RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ARTHUR HAWES, M.D. and FERRELL-DUNCAN CLINIC, INC., Defendants-RespondentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025