Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Michaels v. Loftus

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 2, 2014No. 3D13-1294Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLagoa, J.

Alexander J. Michaels (“Michaels”), an attorney, was found in direct criminal con*329tempt by the trial court, and sentenced to two days incarceration. For the following reasons, I respectfully dissent as I would grant the petition and vacate the judgment and sentence in its entirety.

I. FACTUAL HISTORY

The direct criminal contempt charges stem from alleged conduct that occurred on the final day of a three-day probation violation hearing. Michaels represented the probationer. Because of Michaels’s behavior throughout the hearing, the trial court admonished him on several occasions to proceed in a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex parte EarmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  2. Saunders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Ex Parte John D. CrewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Gidden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Krueger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API