Legal Opinion
Gidden v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 4, 1993No. 79387PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
613 So.2d 457 (1993)
Milton GIDDEN, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 79387.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 4, 1993.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James N. Charles and Rebecca Roark Wall, Asst. Attys. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.
OVERTON, Justice.
We have for review Gidden v. State, 593 So.2d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), in which the district court held that written findings of fact, setting forth the basis for indirect criminal contempt, are not required under rule…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Hofeling v. HofelingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Gidden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by32 opinions
- Kelley v. RiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Neeld v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Woods v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Schenck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Hagan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.