Richard I, Inc. v. Ambach
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sweeney, J. P.
Petitioners operate private cosmetology schools licensed by the Education Department (department) under the provisions of article 101 of the Education Law. Pursuant to existing law, such schools are required to file periodic *128applications for renewal of licensure (Education Law, §§ 5001, 5003). In 1979, the forms on which schools were required to report data to the department were revised so as to require information concerning their students’ racial and ethnic backgrounds, possible academic and/or economic disadvantages and other related information.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MATTER OF ORG. TO ASSURE SERVS. FOR EXCEPTIONAL STUDENTS, INC. v. AmbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rubin v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hirsch v. HastingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Richard I, Inc. v. AmbachNew York Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- Daxor Corp. v. State of New York Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lock v. New York State Education DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- M.S.B.A. Corp. v. MarkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- MATTER OF RICHARD I, INC. v. AmbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Court Reporting Institute, Inc. v. New York State Education DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.