Legal Opinion
Melanson v. Rantoul
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided March 17, 1982No. Civ. A. 75-0036PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETTINE, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff alleges she has been the subject of sex discrimination under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and violations of the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d). In her post trial memorandum she invokes for the first time the additional theory of retaliatory employment practices directed against her in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3.
Sublime simplicity is not a hallmark of the factual setting of this case and the plaintiff’s statement that facts related to certain of the plaintiff’s claims “do not lend themselves to chronological presentation” is in the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Grigoletti v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Wilma Hein, and Others Similarly Situated v. Oregon College of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Karen D. Peters, Cross-Appellants v. The City of Shreveport, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Chang v. University of Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.