Legal Opinion

Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle v. Public Employment Relations Commission

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1992No. 57935-1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.

Facts of Case

The question raised by this appeal is whether the Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC) has authority to order "interest" arbitration as part of an unfair labor practice remedy. We hold that, in limited circumstances, it does.

The PERC order challenged in this action requires the employer, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro), to participate in interest arbitration if collective bargaining between Metro and the International Federation, of Professional and Technical Engineers, Local 17, AFL-CIO (Local 17) does not result in a coEective bargaining agreement.

"Interest…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. H. K. Porter Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Yakima v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Green River Community College v. Higher Education Personnel BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Roza Irrigation District v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Smith v. Bates Technical CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Peninsula School District No. 401 v. Public School EmployeesWashington Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API