Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*1308OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This appeal stems from a proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 24 ancillary to an interference proceeding in the United States Patent Office. The controversy between the parties is no stranger to this court, having been here twice before on prior appeals.1 The present petition is an appeal by Babcock & Wilcox Company (Babcock & Wilcox) from district court orders denying their request for sanctions sought pursuant to Rule 37, F.R.Civ.P. against Foster Wheeler Corporation (Foster Wheeler) and upholding the claim of attorney-client privilege made by Foster Wheeler with respect to…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Natta v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- In Re Natta, Movant, in the United States Patent Office Before the Examiner of Interferences, Interference No. 89634. Hogan v. Zletz v. Baxter v. Natta Natta, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
4Cited by6 opinions
- Simon v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Vincent J. Frilette, and Paul R. Weisz, Movants-Appellants v. Charles N. Kimberlin, Jr., and Elroy M. Gladrow, Opposers. Richard J. Duffy v. Gerald Barnes, Joseph R. Preziosi, William F. McGuinness James B. Duke,richard A. Craig, Charles C. Faroni, Richard Baubles and Donald Sager,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Foster Wheeler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Frilette v. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- MARTIN v. WETZELDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.