Legal Opinion
Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 9, 1969No. 17872PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a district court order denying appellant's motion under F.R.Civ.P. 34 for an order compelling the appellee to produce certain documents for inspection and copying in connection with a contested Interference Proceeding pending between them in the Patent Office.
Section 24 of 35 U.S.C.A. authorizes the district court of the district wherein testimony is to be taken for use in a contested case in the Patent Office to entertain applications under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to the attendance of witnesses and to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Natta, Movant, in the United States Patent Office Before the Examiner of Interferences, Interference No. 89634. Hogan v. Zletz v. Baxter v. Natta Natta, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
3Cited by9 opinions
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Frilette v. KimberlinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Vincent J. Frilette, and Paul R. Weisz, Movants-Appellants v. Charles N. Kimberlin, Jr., and Elroy M. Gladrow, Opposers. Richard J. Duffy v. Gerald Barnes, Joseph R. Preziosi, William F. McGuinness James B. Duke,richard A. Craig, Charles C. Faroni, Richard Baubles and Donald Sager,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Foster Wheeler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.