Legal Opinion

Starkey v. City of Longmont

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 10, 1932No. 12,821PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

This cause is before us on an agreed record. The par ties are hereinafter referred to as Starkey and the city, respectively.

Starkey was fined for violating a city ordinance by operating a gasoline filling* station without a license. To review that judgment he prosecutes this writ.

The ordinance in question vested unlimited discretion in the city council to grant or refuse such a license. For that reason Starkey says it is void. It also provided that no license should issue for a station having no attendant in charge. Starkey says the court committed reversible error in rejecting* his offer of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bizzell Ex Rel. Bizzell v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Julian v. Golden Rule Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. State v. FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hi-Lo Oil Company v. City of CrowleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Cross v. BilettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API