Legal Opinion

Christy D. Holcomb v. BioLife Plasma, LLC, et al.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided March 24, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00728Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION CHRISTY D. HOLCOMB, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-cv-00728 BIOLIFE PLASMA, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is the Motion to Transfer Venue, (ECF No. 9), of Defendants BioLife Plasma, L.L.C., BioLife Plasma Services L.P., and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., (collectively the “Defendants”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND This action arises from Plaintiff Christy D. Holcomb’s (“Plaintiff”)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. New York Marine & General Insurance v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Plumbing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API