Legal Opinion

State v. Glantz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 24, 1969No. 49577PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Justice:

This matter is before us on a motion to-dismiss the State’s appeal. Defendants contend in motion that this Court is without jurisdiction to review the matter .by appeal for the reason that the case is not appealable. They urge that this Court may only review the matter after the State applies for and is granted a writ of certiorari and prohibition. For reasons hereinafter stated, we find that the motion to dismiss is without merit.

Defendants were jointly charged by bill of information with a violation of LSA-R.S. 40 :962 — selling marijuana. After entering a plea of not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Cutrer v. PitcherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Hart v. HicksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SiegelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. State v. GlantzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  3. State of Louisiana v. Darryl James TheriotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. State v. AndrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  5. State v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API