Legal Opinion

State v. Glantz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 9, 1969No. 49577PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARHAM, Justice.

Stephen J. Glantz and Harold Kenner were charged with selling marijuana in violation of R.S. 40:962. After Glantz pleaded guilty as charged arid Kenner pleaded guilty to attempt to sell marijuana,, each was sentenced to serve five years at hard labor. The sentences were suspended,, however, and both defendants were placed on probation for five years. The State filed a rule to. require the trial court to recall the sentences, urging that the applicable penal provision is Subsection (3) of R.S. 40:981, and that under it sentence upon conviction for the sale of a narcotic drug…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ughbanks v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  4. State v. MockosherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. State v. GlantzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. StetsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. State v. MiddlebrookSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  4. State v. RoseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  5. State v. BaudoinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API