Legal Opinion

Mobil Oil Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, State of Texas, Western Fuels Association, Inc., Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Sunoco Energy Development Company, Intervenors. Wyobraska Landowners Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Chicago and North Western Transportation Co., State of Texas, Sunoco Energy Development Company, Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 22, 1982No. 81-2037Published

1Opinion of the Court

685 F.2d 624

222 U.S.App.D.C. 174, 13 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,223

MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Petitioner,

v.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America,

Respondents,

Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, et al.,

State of Texas, Western Fuels Association, Inc., Burlington

Northern Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company,

Sunoco Energy Development Company, Intervenors.

WYOBRASKA LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners,

v.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America,

Respondents,

Union Pacific Railroad Company, Chicago and North Western

Transportation Co., State…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Penn-Central Merger & N & W Inclusion CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Rsr Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API