Wheeling Corp. v. Columbus & Ohio River Railroad

{¶ 170} Because I conclude that the issues raised in appellant’s first and second assignments of error are moot, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which addresses such issues.

{¶ 171} Appellees contend that appellant’s first and second assignments of error are moot because appellant failed to seek a stay of the trial court’s judgment(s) and that on November 9, 2000, ORDC adopted Resolution 00-16. Resolution 00-16 authorized ORDC, through its executive director, to execute all necessary documents in order to enter into an operating agreement with C&OR for the…