Legal Opinion

Von Lubken v. Hood River County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1995No. 94-132; CA A86839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioners seek review and respondent Hanel Lumber Company, Inc., (respondent) cross-petitions from LUBA’s remand of Hood River County’s allowance of respondent’s application1 for a conditional use permit to operate a golf course in an agricultural zone. We affirm on the petition and on the cross-petition.

Petitioners argue that LUBA erred in remanding, rather than reversing, the county’s order. They also ascribe error to LUBA’s failure to hold that, or to require the county to consider whether, the cumulative impact of all of the assertedly “documented changes” in farm practices and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cusma v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Von Lubken v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Citizens Against Irresponsible Growth v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Waste Not of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Durig v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API