Legal Opinion

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. FRIESEN

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 2016No. SCBD 6333PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Y.C.J.:

¶ 1 On November 13, 2015, the Complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA), commenced these proceedings pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 O.S. 2011, ch. 1, app. 1-A, and charged the Respondent, Larry Douglas Friesen (Friesen), with one count of misconduct. In Count I, the OBA alleged Friesen failed to represent his clients, Alma and Oscar Nevarez, with competence and diligence, failed to keep them informed about the ‘representation and failed to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. In addition, the OBA alleged he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. CooleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WilburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LivsheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KNIGHTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BEDNARSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  3. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BEDNARSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  4. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. PISTONIKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WATKINSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API