Legal Opinion

Simons v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1933No. 9791PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Without complying with the procedure prescribed in R.S. 1925, arts. 6703-6705, and without prior written request from or notice to appellants, or any one else other than the two appellee railway companies, that such action would be taken, the appellee commissioners' court of Jackson county, pursuant to a transaction initiated and carried out between themselves and the railway companies alone, vacated, closed, and abandoned the public crossing over the latters' railroad on Lavaca street near the town of Edna at cattle guards 67A and B, with permission to the companies to extend their fences…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Talton v. MayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Corrigan v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Dallas Cotton Mills v. Industrial Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Bowers v. City of TaylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Commissioners' Court of Harris County v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eastex Wildlife Conservation Ass'n v. JASPER, ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Mayer v. KostesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Jacobs v. City of DenisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Boyd v. DillardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API