Watson v. Christensen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
In this will contest, the jury returned special verdicts finding that testator was without testamentary ca paeity and that his will was the product of undue influence. Proponents appeal from the judgment denying probate.
Testator was 80 years old at the time of execution of this will, one day before his death. His son, the contestant, was the only child of decedent. Although his parents had been divorced when he was five, he had maintained a close relationship with his father, spending school vacations with him, and, after his own marriage, visited the father frequently.
In 1948, the father…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Estate of LingenfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Estate of ChevallierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Estate of FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Estate of LauthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Estate of MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Edwards v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Estate of NigroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Domestic & Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964