Corning Tunnel, etc., Co. v. Pell
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. .
1Opinion of the Court
Elbert, J..
In November, 1875, the appellees made application under the law for a patent to the “ Slide lode.” The appellant filed an adverse claim and brought ejectment in the district court for the county of Boulder to determine the title. A change of venue was taken to the district court for the county of Arapahoe, where a trial was had to the court, and on motion of appellees a judgment of nonsuit was entered. The appellant claims by virtue of its tunnel site location, made Sept. 18,1872, under the act of Congress of May 10,1872, and by virtue of the work done in and upon its tunnel.
This…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ilfeld v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Witcher v. GibsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
- Enterprise Min. Co. v. Rico-Aspen Consolidated Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Ellet v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Riter-Conley Manufacturing Co. v. MzikCuyahoga Circuit Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.