Legal Opinion

Darryl Hines v. Barbara Langhenry

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 30, 2011No. 09-3354UnpublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Darryl Hines appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendants on Plaintiffs claims that Defendants unlawfully interfered with his ability to recover attorney fees from his former clients. Because we determine that summary judgment on the tortious interference claims was proper, and because Plaintiffs remaining claims lack merit, we AFFIRM.

Plaintiff-Appellant Darryl Hines was employed as an attorney in the City of Cleveland’s Labor and Employment Section. After leaving that position, he initiated a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claim…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Arendale v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Judy Lynn Tahfs, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. William N. Proctor Miranda K. Proctor, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Chao v. Hall Holding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. New London Tobacco Market v. Ky. Fuel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  2. Blair v. BlairDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  3. Bronson v. At Your Service TowingDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. Duhart v. ClementDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. Guy v. Board of Education Rock Hill Local SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API