Legal Opinion

United States v. Armedo-Sarmiento

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 10, 1975No. 384, Docket 75-1329PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants Francisco Adriano Armedo-Sarmiento and Libardo Gill were indicted (along with 36 others) for conspiring to import and distribute cocaine and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 963. The Government moved to disqualify Armedo and Gill’s retained counsel, the firm of Kassner & Detsky, on the grounds that the law firm had previously, in criminal cases, represented three individuals whom the Government planned to use as witnesses. At a hearing before the trial judge, two of these witnesses had indicated that they were unwilling to waive their attorney-client privileges with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. James J. Kevlik v. David B. Goldstein, Town of DerryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. Roy Wilson v. Barry MintzesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Patrick J. Cunningham and John J. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Joseph Vincent Agosto, United States of America v. Deil Otto Gustafson, United States of America v. Joan Lorrain NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. Douglas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API