Legal Opinion
Francis v. OFFICER CHEVAIR
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 6, 2007No. AC 27102PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, J.
The plaintiff, Ernest Francis, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his administrative appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff argues that the dismissal was improper because his appeal was cognizable under the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA), General Statutes §§ 4-166 through 4-189. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural history is relevant. The plaintiff is incarcerated at the MacDougall-Walker Reception/Special Management Unit and, in early 2004, was participating in a prison work…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Taylor v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Retzer v. Board of Trustees of State CollegesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Searles v. Department of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ferguson Mechanical Co. v. Department of Public WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Johnson v. RellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Metropolitan District v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- First Merchants Group Ltd. Partnership v. FordhamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Francis v. OFFICER CHEVAIRSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007