Legal Opinion

Sewell v. Sewell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1918No. 769PublishedCited by 4 opinions

' Motion for new trial. Before Judge Hodges. Franklin superior court. November 24, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

A brief of the evidence is essentially a part of a valid motion for a new trial. Consequently where a motion for new trial is filed during the term, and for want of time to prepare and file a brief of the evidence an order is obtained from the court allowing the movant until *474a certain time- in vacation to prepare and file a brief of the evidence in the case, and to amend the motion, and where at the time designated in the order no brief of the evidence is prepared and presented, but an amended motion for new trial is offered, it is not error for the court to refuse to allow -the amended…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Groves v. GrovesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Grant v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Grantham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API