Groves v. Groves
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtIIill, J.
A brief of tlie evidence is essentially a part of a valid motion for new trial. Consequently, where a motion for new trial was filed and no brief of the evidence was presented, the court did not err in dismiss*769ing the motion. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6082, 6306; Baker v. Johnson, 99 Ga. 374 (27 S. E. 706); Mize v. Americus Mfg. &c. Co., 106 Ga. 140 (32 S. E. 22) ; Sewell v. Sewell, 148 Ga. 473 (96 S. E. 1037).
No. 9689. October 12, 1933. William T. Bay and Fred A. Gillen, for plaintiff in error. Wolver M. Smith, Glande Mehaffey, and Jalee B. Joel, contra.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices conowr.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Mize v. Americus Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Sewell v. SewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- McDonald v. WimpySupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Whidby v. FeaginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Powell v. WeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935