Legal Opinion

Mechanics' Bank v. Donnell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Hickory Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDhyden, Judge

This was a suit founded on a negotiable promissory note for the sum of four thousand five hundred dollars, made by the defendants W. L. and T. E. Donnell, A. E. Doak and J. D. Donnell, payable to the order of the defendants W. L. and T. E. Donnell, four months after its date. There was no averment of the endorsement and delivery of the note by the payees to the plaintiff, but in lieu thereof, by way of showing the plaintiff’s title, the petition after the usual aver-ments as to the making of the note, proceeds thus: “ That on the same day (the day it was made) the said promissory note was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. E. U. Hugumin & Co. v. HindsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. PenningtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Hawes v. MulhollandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Welker v. HayesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API