Legal Opinion

E. U. Hugumin & Co. v. Hinds

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Laclede Circuit Court. — Hon. L. B. Wood-side, Judge. (1) It was tire duty of the plaintiff to allege and prove three elementary facts: (a) That he was a bona fide purchaser before maturity, (b) The indorsement by the payee, and before maturity, (c) A consideration. (2) Under the pleadings each of these three points was a question of fact and should have been submitted to the jury. Worrell v. Roberts, 58 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Laclede Circuit Court. — Hon. L. B. Wood-side, Judge. (1) It was tire duty of the plaintiff to allege and prove three elementary facts: (a) That he was a bona fide purchaser before maturity, (b) The indorsement by the payee, and before maturity, (c) A consideration. (2) Under the pleadings each of these three points was a question of fact and should have been submitted to the jury. Worrell v. Roberts, 58 Mo. App. 197; Campbell v. Hoff, 129 Mo. 317; Seehorn v. Bank, 148 Mo. 256. (1) This is an action commenced in the Laclede Circuit Court upon a certain promissory note as the cause…

1Opinion of the CourtBarclay, J.

— This action was begun in July, 1899, by plaintiff against the two defendants, in the circuit court of Laclede county, Missouri. It is founded on the following instrument:

“$150.00. Lebanon, Mo., Oct. 19, 1898.
“Six months after date we, each as principal, promise to pay to the order of D. P. Hulbert, Manager Genille, of 923 Olive street, St. Louis, Mo., one hun*349dred and fifty dollars, for value received, negotiable and payable without defalcation or discount at the Bank of Lebanon, in Lebanon, Missouri, with interest from date at the rate of eight per cent per annum until paid, and if interest…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gannon v. Laclede Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Gregory v. ChambersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Wolff v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Borgess Investment Co. v. VetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. Bryan v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1835

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GraysonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Capitol Hill State Bank v. Rawlins National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hill v. DillonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. First State Bank v. HammondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Pierce Loan Co. v. KillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API