Legal Opinion
State v. Hamilton
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1996No. 1995-0172PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 636.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HAMILTON, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Hamilton,
1996-Ohio-440.] Criminal procedure—Postconviction remedies—Prosecutor’s participation in a hearing on an application to seal the record of a conviction is not limited to issues specified by prosecutor in written objection filed pursuant to R.C. 2953.32(B). A prosecutor’s participation in a hearing on an application to seal the record of a conviction is not limited to issues specified by the prosecutor in a written objection filed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. D.D.G.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. J.K.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. GrilloOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. PuckettOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. A.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.