Legal Opinion

Blazer Electric Supply Co. v. Bertrand

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1998No. 97CA0462PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

Defendant, Julius Bertrand, appeals from the trial court’s order denying his C.R.C.P. 60(b) motion seeking to set aside a final judgment previously entered against him in favor of plaintiff, Blazer Electric Supply Company (Blazer). We affirm.

Following a trial to the court at which Bertrand failed to appear or participate, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Blazer and against Bertrand on the merits of the action. Shortly before trial, Bertrand unsuccessfully attempted to remove the case to federal court, and thereafter made no contact with the trial court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Dunton v. Whitewater West Recreation, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. City of Valparaiso v. Iron Workers Local Union 395District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
  5. Guevara v. FoxhovenColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Zions First National Bank, N.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment v. CaulkColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Limehouse v. HulseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Spanair S.A. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API