Legal Opinion

Grant v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 25, 1932No. 8 Div. 434Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an action on a promissory note; the plaintiffs suing as “The Governing Board of Trustees of the Georgia School of Technology.”

The complaint consists of two counts, substantially following form 1 prescribed by section 9531 of the Code for suits on promissory notes. This form first appeared in the Code of 1852 on page 551, and in Jemison & Sloan v. Dealing’s Executors, 41 Ala. 283, 291, it was observed: “There is nothing in the Code, which inhibits a partnership note from being given in evidence under a complaint in form of the last on page 551 of the Code, if the plcdntiff is the payee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smythe v. Dothan F. & M. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Jemison & Sloan v. Dearing's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  3. Phillips v. Americus Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Schwartz Motor Co. v. Bradley Real Estate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. McCrummen v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API