Legal Opinion

McCrummen v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Coffee. Tried before the Hon. J. M. Carmichael.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

1. The complaint in the present case contains a special count on a promissory note, describing it, and adding the words, “The plaintiff avers that the defendant waived his right to the benefit of exemptions, and such waiver is plainly inserted in the face of said note.” The complaint contains two other counts, in form common counts, which contain no averment of waiver of exemptions. The first of the common counts claims “ one hundred and forty-three dollars due by account.” This count contains no averment of consideration, and it is questionable if it is sufficient. The second common count is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flinn v. BarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Reed v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  3. Houston v. HiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Harper v. ClaxtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  5. Lea v. CassenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Long v. GwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Johnson Bros. v. SeldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. Davis v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Ex Parte First Nat. Bank of OzarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Muse v. DantzlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API