Commonwealth v. Johnston
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
These cross-appeals are from the judgment of sentence imposed after appellee 1 was found guilty in a bench trial of possession with intent to deliver 2 and simple possession. 3 Appellee contends that: (1) his motion to suppress evidence should have been granted because the totality of the circumstances did not establish probable cause for issuance of a search warrant; and (2) his demurrer should have been sustained because the Commonwealth did not adduce evi dence from which it could be concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that he constructively possessed the contraband recovered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BoernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. DeCampliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. EbertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. KlingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. BleighSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. PostellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.