Legal Opinion
State v. Wicker
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 2, 2001No. 46002-1-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
20 P.3d 1007 (2001)
105 Wash.App. 428
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Tara WICKER, Appellant.
No. 46002-1-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
April 2, 2001.
Gregory Charles Link, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, for Appellant.
Scott A. Marlow, King County Prosecuting Attorney, Seattle, for Respondent.
WEBSTER, J.
Appellant argues that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel because her attorney's untimely filing of a notice for revision deprived her of her right to seek revision of the commissioner's ruling finding her guilty of fourth degree assault. Because she was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wallace v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RamerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RamerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Jenkins v. DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA CENTERSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.