Legal Opinion

Marshall v. City of Cambridge

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 9, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of Appellate Division affirmed. This is an action of tort, brought in a District Court, in which the plaintiff seeks to recover, from the defendant city, compensation for a personal injury sustained as a result of falling on a sidewalk on a public highway. The parties agreed that if the notice given by the plaintiff was sufficient as matter of law there should be a finding for him. The judge of the District Court ruled that the notice was sufficient and found for the plaintiff. The Appellate Division ordered this finding vacated and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Town of WinthropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Blanchard v. Stone's Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Merrill v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Cameron v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watts v. RhodesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Dean v. City of BostonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API