Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Yong

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 2018No. 19 EAP 2016PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUSTICE MUNDY

We 'granted review to consider the parameters of what has been termed the collective knowledge doctrine.1 The specific issue presented in this case is whether an investigating officer’s knowledge of facts sufficient to create probable cause to arrest may be imputed to a second officer, who arrests the suspect, when the two officers are working as a team, but there is no evidence the investigating officer with probable cause -directed the arresting officer to act. Under the version of the collective knowledge doctrine we adopt today, we conclude Yong’s arrest was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. In the Interest of L.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. Brogdon, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Com. v. Adams, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Brevard, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API