Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1884PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the Court

Ey the Court,

Lord, J.:

This is a suit for a divorce in which the plaintiff obtained a decree in the court below on the ground of cruelty. The evidence in the case is quite voluminous and we have concluded that no useful purpose will be subserved by reviewing it. We have examined it patiently and carefully and the conclusion reached is in conflict with the decree rendered. While it may be conceded that the defendant has not at all times acted toward his wife with consideration, forbearance and affection, yet it must be admitted that she has been quite, if not equally, as remiss, and that much…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Skinner v. SkinnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hengen v. HengenOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Crumbley v. CrumbleyOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hawley v. HawleyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Thomsen v. ThomsenOregon Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API