Von Wettberg v. Carson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Covenant, -upon a receipt given for attached property; brought to the City Court of the city of Hartford, and tried on an issue closed to the court. Facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and motion in error by the plaintiff. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
The facts of this case are substantially as follows: On the 24th of July, 1875, a writ was issued in favor of Ohauncey B. Boardman, of Hartford, against James Tehan, directed to the sheriff of Hartford County, his deputy, or either constable of the town of Hartford, with directions to attach to the value of seven hundred dollars the property of the defendant. The writ was placed in the hands of the plaintiff as deputy sheriff, who served the same, and on the 24th of July, 1875, pursuant to the instructions of the attorney of Boardman, the plaintiff in serving the writ of attachment took into…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Coggill v. BotsfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coffin v. DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Crepeau v. GronagerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Cowles Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co. v. LowreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Lowry v. Cowles Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- Eau Claire Grocer Co. v. HubbardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.