Erfurt v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Defendant State of California appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Mary Erfurt (plaintiff) following a jury trial. While using a state highway, plaintiff struck a guardrail in front of a concrete pillar supporting an overcrossing on the highway. Plaintiff sued the state for her personal injuries, alleging the state allowed a dangerous condition to exist on a public highway and failed to warn about it. Plaintiff was awarded damages in the net amount of $108,000, the jury having determined the state was 60 percent at fault and plaintiff 40 percent at fault.
Facts
On the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Ducey v. Argo Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Fish v. Los Angeles Dodgers Baseball ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Rodriguez v. Inglewood Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Tindall v. County of NevadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025