Legal Opinion

Erfurt v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1983No. Civ. 25947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

Defendant State of California appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Mary Erfurt (plaintiff) following a jury trial. While using a state highway, plaintiff struck a guardrail in front of a concrete pillar supporting an overcrossing on the highway. Plaintiff sued the state for her personal injuries, alleging the state allowed a dangerous condition to exist on a public highway and failed to warn about it. Plaintiff was awarded damages in the net amount of $108,000, the jury having determined the state was 60 percent at fault and plaintiff 40 percent at fault.

Facts

On the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ducey v. Argo Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Fish v. Los Angeles Dodgers Baseball ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Rodriguez v. Inglewood Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Tindall v. County of NevadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API