Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided February 24, 1960No. Nos. 4238, 4392, 4399 and 4486-ConsolidatedPublished

1Opinion of the CourtTolson, C. J.

The claims of certain landowners, tenants, or both, for the recovery of damages occasioned by the alleged neglect of the State of Illinois in its operation of a game preserve, known as Horseshoe Lake, in Alexander County, Illinois, are involved in these consolidated cases.

The complaints, as amended, charge the State in the following terms:

That the State of Illinois, through its Department of Conservation, owns and operates Horseshoe Lake Game Preserve.

That respondent, by virtue of Chap. 61, Sec. 154, Ill. Rev. Stats., has ownership and title to all wild birds.

That respondent, in the operation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Barrett v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Magner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. People v. DiekmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. People v. BridgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API